Gjornâl Furlan des SiencisFriulian Journal of Science

No. 4 (2003): GFS
RASSEGNIS

Functional neuroimaging and the bilingual brain

PDF (English)
  • DANIELA PERANI
DANIELA PERANI
Vita Salute San Raffaele University, Milano, Italy.

Peraulis clâf

  • Bilingualism,
  • Aphasia,
  • Cerebral rapresentation,
  • Age of acquisition

Cemût citâ

[1]
PERANI, D. 2003. Functional neuroimaging and the bilingual brain. Gjornâl Furlan des Siencis - Friulian Journal of Science. 2, 4 (Dec. 2003), 115–131.

Ristret

The advent of non-invasive neuroimaging techniques opened up a new era in the investigation of language organization in healthy individuals. Positron emission tomography (PET) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) enabled neuroscientists to examine the mechanisms of cognitive functioning and to probe on-line the close relationship between brain and mind. This is an overview of the most relevant results that have so far been achieved in the field of the cerebral basis of bilingualism by using functional neuroimaging techniques. I will discuss which conclusions may be drawn from these studies considering, in particular, the potential role of a number of variables which have been suggested to play a role in the shaping of language representations in the bilingual brain. Consistent results indicate that second language (L2) proficiency and language exposure and the age of L2 acquisition are very important determinants of the cerebral representation of languages in bilinguals/polyglots. Neuroimaging technologies, such as positron emission tomography (PET) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) allow to capture “in vivo” images of the physiology of mind processes. For instance, they show how specific regions of the brain “light up” when subjects are engaged in linguistic activities, such as listening to stories or producing words. Hence, they provide us with a powerful tool for mapping the language faculty in the human brain. The issue of language and brain mechanism becomes more intriguing if we consider the unique capacity of the human brain to acquire, store, and use more than one language. Actually, more than half of the world population speaks more than one language. It becomes clear that related questions deserve serious attention, whether they are theoretical or practical in nature. How do bilingual people understand and produce language? How do people learn and acquire a second language? How does the human brain represent and organize multiple languages? Are there different or overlapping brain areas responsible for the language processes of different languages? And in the case of differential cerebral organization of languages, is this due to the age of second language (L2) acquisition or rather to the degree of L2 proficiency? These are just a few of the many questions that can be raised in this respect. The latter three issues are of particular interest to neuroscientists and may be well addressed with the advances of functional neuroimaging techniques.

PDF (English)

Riferiments

  1. Albert M.L. & Obler L.K. (1978). The bilingual brain. New York: Academic Press.
  2. Birdsong D. (1999). Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  3. Birdsong D. (2003). Interpreting Age Effects in Second Language Acquisition. In J.F. Kroll & A.M.B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  4. Bottini G., Corcoran R., Sterzi R., Paulesu E., Schenone P., Scarpa, Frachowiak R.S.J. & Frith C.D. (1994). The role of the right hemisphere in the interpretation of figurative aspects of language. A positron emission tomography activation study. Brain, 117: 1231-1253.
  5. Calvin W.H. & Ojemann G.A. (1994). Conversation with Neil’s brain. New York, NY: Addison Wesley Publishing Company.
  6. Chee M.W.L., Caplan D., Soon C.S., Sriram N., Tan E.W.L., Thiel T. & Weekes B. (1999b). Processing of visually presented sentences in Mandarin and English studied with fMRI. Neuron, 23: 127-137.
  7. Chee M.W.L., Hon N., Ling Lee H. & Soon C.S. (2001). Relative language proficiency modulates BOLD signal change when Bilinguals perform semantic judgments. Neuroimage, 13: 1155-1163.
  8. Chee M.W.L., Tan E.W.L. & Thiel T. (1999a). Mandarin and English single word processing studied with functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Journal of Neuroscience, 19: 3050-3056.
  9. De Groot A.M.B. & Kroll J.F. (1997) (Eds), Tutorials in Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  10. Dehaene S.D., Dupoux E., Mehler J., Cohen L., Paulesu E., Perani D., van de Moortele P.F., Lehéricy S. & Le Bihan D. (1997). Anatomical variability in the cortical representation of first and second languages. Neuroreport, 8: 3809-3815.
  11. DeKeyser R. & Larson-Hall J. (2003). What does the critical period really mean? In J.F. Kroll & A.M.B. de Groot (Eds). Handbook of Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  12. Dufour R. & Kroll J.F. (1995). Matching words to concepts in two languages: A test of the concept mediation model of bilingual representation. Memory and Cognition, 23: 166-180.
  13. Fabbro F. (1999). The Neurolinguistics of Bilingualism. An introduction. Hove, East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
  14. Flege J.E., Munro M.J. & MacKay I.R.A. (1995). Effects of age of second-language learning on the production of English Consonants. Speech Communication, 16: 1-26.
  15. Fletcher P.C., Happé F., Frith U., Baker S.C., Dolan R.J., Frachowiak R.S.J. & Frith C.D. (1995). Other minds in the brain: a functional imaging study of “theory of mind” in story comprehension. Cognition, 57: 109-128.
  16. Illes J., Francis W.S., Desmond J.E., Gabrieli J.D.E., Glover G.H., Poldrack R., Lee C.J. &
  17. Wagner A.D. (1999). Convergent cortical representation of semantic processing in bilinguals. Brain and Language, 70: 347-363.
  18. Indefrey P. & Levelt W.J.M. (2000). The neural correlates of language production. In M.S. Gazzaniga (Ed). The new cognitive neurosciences. The MIT Press: Cambridge.
  19. Johnson J. & Newport E. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: the influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21: 60-99.
  20. Kim K.H.S., Relkin N.R., Lee K.M. & Hirsch J. (1997). Distinct cortical areas associated with native and second languages. Nature, 388: 171-174.
  21. Klein D., Milner B., Zatorre R., Meyer E. & Evans A. (1995). The neural substrates underlying word generation: A bilingual functional-imaging study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 92: 2899-2903.
  22. Klein D., Zatorre R., Milner B., Meyer E. & Evans A. (1994). Left putaminal activation when speaking a second language: evidence from PET. Neuroreport, 5: 2295-2297.
  23. Kroll J.F. & Stewart E. (1994). Category Interference in Translation and Picture Naming: Evidence for Asymmetric Connections Between Bilingual Memory Representations. Journal of Language and Memory, 33: 149-174.
  24. Lenneberg E.H. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.
  25. Martin A., Wiggs C.L., Ungerleider L.G. & Haxby E. (1996). Neural correlates of categoryspecific knowledge. Nature, 379: 649-652.
  26. Mazoyer B.M., Tzourio N., Frank V., Syrota A., Murayama N., Levrier O., Salamon G., Dehaene S., Cohen L. & Mehler J.(1993). The cortical representation of speech. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5: 467-479.
  27. Moro A., Tettamanti M., Perani D., Donati C., Cappa S.F. & Fazio F. (2001). Syntax and the brain: disentangling grammar by selective anomalies. Neuroimage, 13: 110-118.
  28. Mummery C.J., Patterson K., Hodges J.R. & Wise R.J.S. (1996). Generating a ‘tiger’ as an animal name or a word beginning with T: differences in brain activations. Proceedings of the Royal Society London. B., 263: 989-995.
  29. Neville H.J. & Bavelier D. (1998). Neural organization and plasticity of language. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 8: 254-258.
  30. Ogawa S., Lee T.M., Kay A.R. & Tank D.W. (1990). Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 87: 9868-9872.
  31. Ojemann G.A. & Whitaker H.A. (1978). The bilingual brain. Archives of Neurology, 35: 409- 412.
  32. Paradis M. (1983). Readings on Aphasia in Bilinguals and Polyglots. Quebec, Canada: Marcel Didier Inc.
  33. Paradis M. (1998). Language and Communication in Multilinguals. In B. Stemmer & H. Whitaker (Eds). Handbook of Neurolinguistics (pp. 417-430). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  34. Paulesu E., Goldacre B., Scifo P., Cappa S.F., Gilardi M.C., Castiglioni I., Perani D. & Fazio F. (1997). Functional heterogeneity of left inferior frontal cortex as revealed by fMRI. NeuroReport, 8: 2011-2016.
  35. Penfield W. (1965). Conditioning the uncommitted cortex for language learning. Brain, 88: 787-798.
  36. Perani D., Abutalebi J., Paulesu E., Brambati S., Scifo P, Cappa S.F. & Fazio F. (2003). The role of age of acquisition and language usage in early, high-proficient bilinguals: a fMRI study during verbal fluency. Human Brain Mapping, 19: 179-182.
  37. Perani D. & Cappa S.F. (1998). Neuroimaging Methods in Neuropsychology. In G. Denes & L. Pizzamiglio (Eds). Handbook of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. Psychology Press Ltd. Taylor & Francis Group, London, UK.
  38. Perani D., Cappa S.F., Schnur T., Tettamanti M., Collina S., Rosa M.M. & Fazio F. (1999). The neural correlates of verb and noun processing: A PET study. Brain, 122: 2337-44.
  39. Perani D., Dehaene S., Grassi F., Cohen L., Cappa S.F., Dupoux E., Fazio F. & Mehler J. (1996). Brain processing of native and foreign languages. NeuroReport, 7: 2439-2444.
  40. Perani D., Paulesu E., Sebastian-Galles N., Dupoux E., Dehaene S., Bettinardi V., Cappa
  41. S.F., Fazio F. & Mehler J. (1998). The bilingual brain: Proficiency and age of acquisition of the second language. Brain, 121: 1841-1852.
  42. Petersen S.E., van Mier H., Fiez J.A. & Raichle M.E. (1998). The effects of practice on the functional anatomy of task performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 95: 853-860.
  43. Poline J.B. et al. (Multi-Center Study) (1996). Reproducibility of PET activation studies: lessons from a multi centre European experiment. Neuroimage, 4: 34-54.
  44. Price C.J. (1998). The functional anatomy of word comprehension and production. Trends in Cognitive Science, 2: 281-288.
  45. Price C.J., Green D. & von Studnitz R. (1999). A functional imaging study of translation and language switching. Brain, 122: 2221-2236.
  46. Raichle M.E., Fiez J.A., Videen T.O., MacLeod A.M., Pardo J.V., Fox P.T. & Petersen S.E.
  47. (1994). Practice related changes in human brain functional anatomy during nonmotor learning. Cerebral Cortex, 4: 8-26.
  48. Scoresby-Jackson R. (1867). Case of aphasia with right hemiplegia. Edinburgh Medical Journal, 12: 696-706.
  49. Segalowitz S.J. (1983). Two sides of the brain. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  50. Smith E.E., Jonides J. & Koeppe R.A. (1996). Dissociating verbal and spatial working memory using PET. Cerebral Cortex, 6: 11-20.
  51. Thompson-Schill S.L., D’Esposito M., Aguirre G.K. & Farah M.J. (1997). Role of left inferior prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: A reevaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 94: 14792-14797.
  52. Thompson-Schill S.L., D’Esposito M. & Kan I.P. (1999). Effects of repetition and competition on activity in left prefrontal cortex during word generation. Neuron, 23: 513-522.
  53. Wartenburger I., Heekeren H.R., Abutalebi J., Cappa S.F., Villringer A. & Perani D. (2003). Early Setting of Grammatical Processing in the Bilingual Brain. Neuron, 37: 159-170.
  54. Weber-Fox C.M. & Neville H.J. (1996). Maturational constraints on functional specialization for language processing: ERP and behavioral evidence in bilingual speakers. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8: 231-256.
  55. Yetkin O., Yetkin F.Z., Haughton V.M. & Cox R.W. (1996). Use of functional MR to map