No. 14 (2010): GFS
RICERCJIS

Optimal pressure management in water networks: increased efficiency and reduced energy costs

MATTEO NICOLINI
Department of Chemistry, Physics and the Environment, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
PAOLO CASSINA
CAFC S.p.A., viale Palmanova 192, Udine, Italy.
MASSIMO BATTISTON
CAFC S.p.A., viale Palmanova 192, Udine, Italy.

Peraulis clâf

  • Water supply,
  • leakages,
  • optimization,
  • valves

Cemût citâ

[1]
NICOLINI, M., CASSINA, P. and BATTISTON, M. 2010. Optimal pressure management in water networks: increased efficiency and reduced energy costs. Gjornâl Furlan des Siencis - Friulian Journal of Science. 14, 14 (Jan. 2010), 59–70.

Ristret

In this paper we address the problem of pressure management in water distribution systems with an aim to reduce pumping energy, water loss through leaks in the networks and the rate of pipe break repairs. After a brief introduction on the description of the problem and the “boundary conditions”, we present a methodology based on single- and multi-objective genetic algorithms (GAs) which, starting from the numerical model of the network, performs calibration and then optimizes the location and control of pressure reducing valves (PRVs), according to some operational constraints that must be satisfied. In particular, the simulation model is calibrated with a real-coded, single-objective GA in order to obtain, on one hand, pipe roughness coefficient values and, on the other, an estimate of the subdivision of the total flow supplied to the network between actual customers demand and water loss. The multi-objective NSGA-II is implemented in order to find the Pareto optimal solutions representing different level of compromise between installation costs and leakage reduction. The application of the methodology to a real network allowed considerable energy and water savings, as evidentiated by the monitoring of the system. Two more advantages are also evident: firstly, the number of interventions for repairing pipes is more than halved, due to the reduced pressure regime (thus enabling the water utility to provide better service more efficiently and reliably); secondly, the surplus water is being diverted to a storage tank of a pumped network, thus allowing a notable reduction of pumping costs.

Riferiments

  1. Deb K., Agrawal S., Pratap A., Meyarivan T. (2002). A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computations, 6(2): 182-197.
  2. Girard M., Stewart R.A. (2007). Implementation of pressure and leakage management strategies on the Gold Coast, Australia: case study. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 133(3): 210-217.
  3. Lambert A.O. (2001). What do we know about pressure:leakage relationship in distribution systems? Proceedings of the IWA Conference on System Approach to Leakage Control and Water Distribution Systems Management, Brno.
  4. Mckenzie R.S. (2002). Khayelitsha: leakage reduction through advanced pressure control. Journal of the Institution for Municipal Engineering of Southern Africa, 27(8): 43-47.
  5. Nicolini M., Zovatto L. (2009). Optimal Location and Control of Pressure Reducing Valves in Water Networks. Journal of Water Resources Planning Management, 135(3): 178-187.
  6. Nicolini M., Giacomello C., Deb K. (2011). Calibration and Optimal Leakage Management for a Real Water Distribution Network. Journal of Water Resources Planning Management, 137(1): 134-142.
  7. Rossman L.A. (2000). Epanet 2 Users Manual., Cincinnati, Ohio: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
  8. Thornton J., Sturm R., Kunkel G. (2008). Water Loss Control. Second Edition, New York: McGraw Hill.